Student learning is the metric for evaluating the quality of content and instruction.

Metrics:

27. State-mandated assessments in core subjects, including annual assessments, end-of-course exams, and high school exit exams, must be administered digitally, either online or on a computer.
28. Outcomes-based student-performance data is used to evaluate the quality of virtual charter
schools, full-time online providers, and individual online courses.
29. As determined by outcomes-based student-performance data, these poor performing schools and courses must be closed:

a. virtual charter schools.
b. full-time online schools.
c. individual online course providers.

Administering tests digitally has multiple benefits. Tests can be administered and scored quickly and efficiently. Computerized scoring provides the opportunity for a cost effective method to create better tests beyond multiple choice, including simulations and constructed responses. Getting the result of tests faster can improve instruction as well as expedite rewards and consequences, which can strengthen accountability for learning.

Learning management systems, digital curriculum, and online summative and formative assessments have the distinctive capability of collecting real-time data on the progress of each student against learning objectives. Instant feedback for students and personalized analytics for teachers provide the support for continuous improvement and competency-based progress.

Outcomes matter. States should hold schools and online providers accountable using
student learning to evaluate the quality of content or instruction. Providers and programs that are poor performing should have their contracts terminated.

History has proven that inputs, such as teacher certification, programmatic budgets and textbook reviews, do not guarantee a quality education. In fact, these regulatory processes often stifle innovation and diminish quality. Policymakers should resist attempts to create a checklist of inputs and, instead, focus on developing an accountability framework that is based on outcomes.

While conversion to digital assessments requires an initial investment, transitioning to a digital system can save money in the long run.